FA Blockhus Police Report Against FA Lense Harassment
FA Blockhus endured a prolonged and escalating pattern of harassment, intimidation, and emotionally abusive behavior from FA Katherine Lense that ultimately became so severe that he felt compelled to seek assistance from law enforcement authorities for his own protection and well-being. The circumstances leading to this action were not isolated incidents, but rather part of an ongoing course of conduct that caused FA Blockhus significant emotional distress, fear for his livelihood, and concern for his personal safety and reputation.
Over an extended period of time, FA Lense repeatedly contacted FA Blockhus through excessive phone calls, text messages, emails, and other communications that became increasingly hostile, threatening, and retaliatory in nature. Evidence later produced demonstrated that FA Lense contacted FA Blockhus hundreds of times between October 2020 and February 2021, despite later attempting to portray herself as harassed by him. These communications were not indicative of an individual attempting to avoid contact, but instead reflected an ongoing and emotionally charged interaction initiated and maintained by FA Lense herself.
The harassment did not stop at verbal communications. FA Blockhus also provided evidence that FA Lense engaged in acts of stalking and intimidation, including security footage allegedly showing FA Lense damaging his vehicle by slashing its tires while wearing her United Airlines uniform. Despite FA Blockhus bringing this evidence to the attention of the company, no meaningful action was taken to protect him or address the conduct.
The totality of the evidence demonstrates that FA Blockhus was not the aggressor in this situation, but rather an individual attempting to protect himself from an ongoing campaign of harassment and retaliation that ultimately contributed to severe emotional distress, deterioration of his health, and devastating consequences to both his personal and professional life.
United Airlines attempted to justify their failure to investigate FA Katherine Lense by asserting that FA Derek Blockhus had never reported her conduct to law enforcement authorities.
Earlier statements made by United Airlines attempted to justify their failure to investigate FA Katherine Lense by asserting that FA Blockhus had never reported her conduct to law enforcement authorities. However, that claim is demonstrably false and is directly contradicted by the evidence contained within this video. The video clearly establishes that FA Blockhus did in fact contact police regarding FA Lense’s conduct, thereby disproving United’s prior assertions and raising serious concerns regarding the accuracy and credibility of the company’s representations throughout this matter.
This evidence is significant because United repeatedly relied upon the position that there was allegedly
“no police report” or “no law enforcement involvement” to rationalize why FA Lense’s actions were not treated as credible misconduct requiring investigation. Yet the existence of this video undermines that justification entirely. The evidence demonstrates that FA Blockhus did seek outside assistance due to the escalating harassment and intimidation he believed he was experiencing from FA Lense.
The fact that United either ignored, overlooked, or failed to acknowledge evidence showing police involvement is deeply concerning. A reasonable investigation would have included reviewing all available evidence, including whether FA Blockhus sought assistance from law enforcement regarding the alleged harassment, stalking, threats, or intimidation. Instead, United appears to have selectively focused only on allegations against FA Blockhus while disregarding substantial evidence supporting his own complaints against FA Lense.
The video further reinforces FA Blockhus’s longstanding position that he was attempting to protect himself from ongoing harassment and retaliation, not engage in misconduct. It also directly contradicts the narrative that he never treated the matter seriously enough to involve authorities. In reality, the evidence shows that the situation had escalated to such an extent that FA Blockhus felt compelled to seek police assistance, which is entirely inconsistent with United’s prior characterization of events.
Additionally, the revelation that FA Blockhus did contact police substantially weakens any claim by United that they acted based upon a balanced or thorough investigation. If the company falsely represented that no police report or law enforcement involvement existed, or ignored evidence proving otherwise, it strongly suggests that United’s investigation was incomplete, biased, or conducted in a manner designed to support a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively determine the truth.
This evidence therefore not only corroborates FA Blockhus’s claims regarding harassment by FA Lense, but also raises serious questions regarding United Airlines’ investigative integrity, credibility, and their repeated reliance on assertions that are now contradicted by the evidence itself.
